From: Lewis Hyatt (lhyatt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-05 17:00:48
> The posted trig method is correct, it chooses a horizontal cutting plane
> uniformly. You can show that the surface area of a sphere contained
> between two z-coordinates only depends on the difference between the two
> coordinates, not their location, so this generates the correct distribution.
> However, the "naive" method is incorrect, the resulting points are not
> uniformly distributed over the sphere. The correct version of the
> "naive" method is given here:
I take it back... this method does work OK after all. I believe those
listed at the above link are superior, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk