Re: [boost] [boost@home] revolutionary solution to create a testing farm

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-08 07:30:11

Ames, Andreas (Andreas) wrote:

>> I don't think anything as radical as a VM is needed, really. Instead,
>> the harness needs to be (incrementally) refined to
>>
>> 1) control as much of the development environment to which 
>> the build process is exposed
>>
>> 2) report all free parameters that influence the outcome.
>>
>> I think this is achievable, using a buildbot setup.
> 
> Seconded.
> 
> I wonder why you don't bring your own QMTest to the table.  Wouldn't it 
> also nicely fit into the boost picture?

Oh, I did. And yes, I think it fits. However, it isn't relevant to this
particular discussion about achieving test coverage and automation.

Both, Rene, as well as Vladimir are aware of QMTest.

Thanks,
                Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...