Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-08 07:30:11

Ames, Andreas (Andreas) wrote:

>> I don't think anything as radical as a VM is needed, really. Instead,
>> the harness needs to be (incrementally) refined to
>> 1) control as much of the development environment to which
>> the build process is exposed
>> 2) report all free parameters that influence the outcome.
>> I think this is achievable, using a buildbot setup.
> Seconded.
> I wonder why you don't bring your own QMTest to the table. Wouldn't it
> also nicely fit into the boost picture?

Oh, I did. And yes, I think it fits. However, it isn't relevant to this
particular discussion about achieving test coverage and automation.

Both, Rene, as well as Vladimir are aware of QMTest.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at