From: Paul Rose (prose_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-08 17:14:19
>> I guess I'l finally include it, but it'd be so much nicer if we could
>> a conclusive use case. I've also thought about legacy interfaces
>> requiring raw pointers, if only we could come up with a simple
>> specific scenario on that line.
Occasionally I want this feature, but admittedly for a fairly weak
Checking for NULL:
is more convenient than checking for end:
if(i == c.end()) ...
If most of the time I need only to check for NULL or dereference then a
pointer is more convenient. When I occasionally need to erase() then I
can use iterator_to...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk