From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-14 12:03:08
"Douglas Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>> I did not suggest that C++ standard should be fixed to make the Typeof
>> library 100% compliant ;-)
>> My point was to mention the technique used; this technique (generating
>> template specializations on demand, and maybe using preprocessor counter
>> give them unique numbers) might be useful in other contexts...
>> Or it might be not.
> I've used this technique a handful of times before, and each time I've
> decided that what I did was an awful hack, never to be repeated. Your
> mileage may vary :)
So you applied it the first time, decided that it was "never to be
repeated", and stll used it a few more times ;-)
Or am I missing your point?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk