From: Jeremy Pack (rostovpack_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-16 18:59:30
> FWIW, I'm not concerned about opening and closing performance of
> boost.extension. I'm only concerned about function calls of plug-ins.
> Which should be fast enough.
Yep - it should just have standard virtual function call overhead,
since we're making calls through base class pointers.
We're going to be a bit more concerned with tracking the performance
of the reflection part of the library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk