From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-18 16:14:07
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>> Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>>> Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>>>> Dear Boost community,
>>>> do we have a function object template to wrap arbitrary constructor
>>>> calls / operator new expressions somewhere in Boost, already?
>>> lambda::new_ptr ?
>> Yep, 'new_ptr' and 'constructor' are almost exactly what I want.
>> Those templates are missing a 'result_type' typedef to become usable as
>> "stand-alone function objects" (outside of Boost.Lambda expressions).
>> Further, the limits are a bit too low for constructing Fusion Sequences
>> and having them configurable would be nice to have, too...
> Yes and IMO these things should be called new_ and construct.
Yep, 'new_ptr' is sorta strange ;-).
I'm not too convinced that 'construct' gives a better name than
'constructor', because looking at
I get the impression that something gets constructed, but in reality
it's just about capturing T's constructor in order to pass it around.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk