From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-19 13:47:01
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> It occurs to me that perhaps it is not unreasonable after all to
> restrict the library to supporting Unicode encodings for in-memory
> character representation.
I personally believe Unicode (not only the character set, but also its
collations and algorithms) is the only viable way to represent
characters, and thus should be the way strings work with. (get out evil
locales and other stuff!)
Of course, various encodings can still be used for serialization.
Unfortunately, C++ is quite far from having good Unicode tools (not that
other programming languages are really better -- Unicode is simply quite
complicated, because human languages just are)
ICU has most of the stuff, but not with the right interfaces.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk