From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-19 18:31:53
Richard Day wrote:
> Yes lack of understanding.
> Unfortunately I could only go on what you had written above, apparently
> you intend something different then what it appeared to suggest.
> My apologies.
Sorry if that was unclear.
90% of the time, the string that specifies the format in (s)printf is a
We could probably exploit that fact to have that parsing done at
compile-time. The syntax would need to be a little different though.
Could be like xpressive static regexes maybe.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk