Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Michael Marcin (mmarcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-19 19:04:22

Next message: Michael Marcin: "[boost] [ptr_container] abstraction penalty"
Previous message: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard: "Re: [boost] [rfc] I/O Library Design"
In reply to: Alex Burton: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"
Next in thread: Vincent Bhérer-Roy: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"
Reply: Vincent Bhérer-Roy: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"

Alex Burton wrote:
> Yes it is unprecedented as in usually a smart pointer does something
> smart.
> If smart pointers are pointers that do something smart then it is not
> one.
>

Perhaps a more fitting name would be dumb_ptr then.

- Michael Marcin

Next message: Michael Marcin: "[boost] [ptr_container] abstraction penalty"
Previous message: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard: "Re: [boost] [rfc] I/O Library Design"
In reply to: Alex Burton: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"
Next in thread: Vincent Bhérer-Roy: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"
Reply: Vincent Bhérer-Roy: "Re: [boost] Request for consideration for my weak_ptr class"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk