From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 12:19:03
"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I think the weight of opinion is firmly behind keeping Quickbook as a
> favoured, but not exclusive, Boost docs tool.
Let me clarify again my point:
Boost should require BoostBook as a documentation format. This is the format
documentation should be kept in source control and delivered with release
Boost shouldn't require what tools are used to generate BoostBook documents.
Whether it's QuickBook, XML editor, any other facility is irrelevant and
libraries authors are free to use any of them (and keep some intermediate
files under source control if necessary)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk