Boost logo

Boost :

From: Douglas Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 16:30:10

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Boost should require BoostBook as a documentation format. This is the
> format
> documentation should be kept in source control and delivered with release
> Boost shouldn't require what tools are used to generate BoostBook
> documents.
> Whether it's QuickBook, XML editor, any other facility is irrelevant and
> libraries authors are free to use any of them (and keep some intermediate
> files under source control if necessary)
>> This is one of the objectives of the "Improving Boost Docs" project.
> Hmm. I never got this fealing. At least I do not see .dokbook files in
> libraries maintaining it's docs as quickbook.
The DocBook or BoostBook XML will be generated via Quickbook when
needed. Or do you want the DocBook/BoostBook XML to always be in the
source tree, even if it can be regenerated?

  - Doug

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at