Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 17:17:02

"Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On 6/25/07, Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> "Douglas Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> > Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> > The DocBook or BoostBook XML will be generated via Quickbook when
>> > needed. Or do you want the DocBook/BoostBook XML to always be in the
>> > source tree, even if it can be regenerated?
>> Yes. Essentially I should be able to generate docs for any library and
>> know
>> nothing about quickbook and it's tools whatsoever. And how you make this
>> file - you own business.
> I agree with Gennady.
> It is better for now to separate quickbook from dockbook.
> We may ask authors to provide:
> libs/{lib_name}/doc/{lib_name}.xml
> libs/{lib_name}/doc/--stringparam
> I like .xml over .docbook but I have no strong opinions about this.
> The --stringparam contains parameters that affects the chunker, that
> have to be library independent.

I would prefer developers wishing to twick output parameters for any output
to generate <output>.xsl in corresponding doc directory.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at