Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-28 18:38:29

Boris Gubenko wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> [...] In fact you can even mark it a known failure for any compiler
>> since this is probably going to be the right default for new
>> toolsets for quite
>> a while.
> You mean "<toolset name="*"/> so it unexpectedly passes on
> gcc-4.3.0_c++0x ?

Yes, I think that this will be best (unless it inhibits testing entirely).
Unfortunately our current infrastructure gives us no easy way to say "only
run this test when BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFS is defined, else consider it an
expected failure". Marking it as expected failure everywhere seems the
closest approximation.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at