From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-12 15:35:14
Stjepan Rajko wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> It's wrong to have the signature for result_of contain references:
>> The result_of specification says the parameter types in the signature
>> type should be interpreted as types of L-Value arguments used in a
>> call expression (cited from memory).
> Hmm - yes, the proposal says:
> "given types F, T1, T2, ..., TN and lvalues f, t1, t2, ..., tN of
> those types, respectively, the type expression
> result_of<F(T1, T2, ..., TN)>::type
> evaluates to the type of the expression f(t1, t2, ..., tN)."
This was once true but is no longer. The final version of the result_of
wording says that t1 is an lvalue when T1 is a reference, an rvalue
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk