From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-20 16:44:09
Phillip Hellewell wrote:
> On 7/20/07, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Michael Caisse wrote:
>>> How about using boost::shared_ptr. Something like this in your class
>>> boost::shared_ptr< boost::recursive_mutex > myMutex;
>> Then you would protect both copies of the resource that is part of the
>> by a single (shared) mutex. That doesn't sound right.
> Exactly, I don't want to copy or share the mutex in any way. I want each
> object to have its own mutex.
Right. And how do you think the compiler will know that ?
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk