From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-29 11:46:03
on Sun Jul 29 2007, Edward Diener <eldiener-AT-tropicsoft.com> wrote:
> I do not think that the situation I have outlined here is good for Boost
> from the end users perspective. The typical end user, when wanting to
> use a particular 3rd party library whether of Boost or otherwise, wants
> to know immediately, before any other action is taken, whether that
> library supports the compiler/version he is using.
> I believe Boost should make it both much easier and always possible to
> determine whether a particular compiler/version can be used with a
> particular library in a particular version of Boost without the end user
> trying to use a library and, if he can not, encountering compiler
> errors. He may not know, even from compiler errors, whether or not the
> errors are his own or simply because the compiler is not supported for
> that library.
> This is not a criticism of Boost in general and certainly not the
> excellent smartptr library, but instead it is an effort to get Boost to
> create some easier system by which end users can determine whether or
> not they can use a Boost library in the particular working situation in
> which they find themselves.
We all know it's a problem, but nobody has yet designed and
implemented a solution. Perhaps you'd be willing to take up the
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk