|
Boost : |
From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-01 14:54:50
Hello Eric,
Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 10:32:04 PM, you wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>> Tuesday, July 31, 2007, 10:22:51 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> This was a proposed library implementation of nullptr for c++0x from
>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1601.pdf
>>
>> Hmm, it seems it doesn't convert to function or member function
>> pointers...
> It can't because of limitations of the syntax for defining conversion
> operators. See the discussion for core issue #395:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#395
But if nullptr is a built in keyword and its decltype is supported by
the compiler itself, there would be no need to describe it in C++
syntax.
-- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk