From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 10:47:30
on Thu Aug 02 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
> there's one bit where out process is not broken, it's
> nonexistent. The important aspect of Boost is that we have lots of
> automated tests, or lots of different configurations and there's the
> goal of no regressions. This is a very strict goal.
> At the same time we don't have any equally strict, or even written
> down bug-triage-and-developer-pinging process.
I agree that we could improve in that area, but it doesn't have much
to do with our long release cycle. The bugs that held up our last
release showed up in our regression tests, not in our bug tracker.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk