From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-04 12:01:07
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> This logical and technical separation between A and B is the kind of
>> modularity I have in mind. Whether that actually leads to separate
>> release cycles for A and B is an entirely different (and to the most
>> degree non-technical) matter.
>> And I believe something similar is what Robert was alluding to when
>> talking about "running development tests on our local system against
>> the latest release". Correct ?
Well, you didn't tell us how you do that. Building a library against an
external boost tree (installed or not) isn't quite supported yet. Have
you modified boost.build locally to fit this purpose ?
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk