Boost logo

Boost :

From: Marcus Lindblom (macke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-07 11:42:30

Beman Dawes wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Tue Aug 07 2007, Beman Dawes <> wrote:
>>> Ah! I wasn't happy with 'core' either, but failed to come up with
>>> anything better. "Prerequisite" is definitely better.
>> I would use "dependent" and "dependency."
> The trouble with those is that they describe a library that depends on
> another. We need a word to describe the library being depended upon.
I've used 'dependee', but I'm not sure if it's correct English.

(IMHO it makes sufficient sense when discussing dependencies back and
forth. :)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at