From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-07 16:37:16
K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Ion GaztaÃ±aga wrote:
>> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>> There's two
>>> copies of this test currently running on my system (gcc-3.4.3 and
>>> gcc-4.0.1), would that matter?
>>> 19303 kbelco 25 0 14944 1380 1188 R 98.9 0.0 40:00.53
>>> 19328 kbelco 25 0 14988 1360 1176 R 98.9 0.0 34:25.73
>> This is really nasty. You should only have one instance, since the
>> is just single-threaded. This can be causing several problems. Can you
>> investigate a bit why is this happening?
> Because I run the boost regression tests like this
> python regression.py --runner="Sandia-gcc" --mail=kbelco_at_[hidden] --
> bjam-toolset=gcc --pjl-toolset=gcc --toolsets="gcc-3.4.3,gcc-4.0.1" --
> So bjam is clearly building / running both named_recursive tests at
> the same time. Am I not permitted to run the boost regression tests
> for multiple toolsets in a single invocation?
This will confuse process_jam_logs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk