From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-08 09:15:38
on Wed Aug 08 2007, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld-AT-sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>> I've used 'dependee', but I'm not sure if it's correct English.
>> No according to me - and as I'm really English English, I should know ;Â¬))
>> I don't think there is an existing word, surprisingly.
>> I am the provider for my dependents, but that too isn't quite the right word?
>> It doesn't quite imply that I really am depended on?
> I still fail to see the problem. What is wrong with 'prerequisite' ?
> The entry in http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prerequisite makes it
> look quite suitable.
There's a subtle temporal aspect ("pre") that I don't think we want to
Actually I don't like either "prerequisite" or "dependency" all that
much, because both imply that the prerequisite/dependency library
isn't useful on its own ("it's just a prerequisite for the rest of
Boost"). I think, unless we're talking explicitly about a
relationship between two libraries, I prefer "core" or "base" or
something simple like Beman chose initially, which distinguishes the
libraries' role without implying any relationship to the other
We can still use that relationship as a criterion for choosing core
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk