From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-08 10:11:32
Edward Diener <eldiener <at> tropicsoft.com> writes:
> Nicola Musatti wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > I just noticed that svn/boost/trunk doesn't contain a top boost
> > directory, while the few tags and branches I checked do, e.g.
> > tags/SPIRIT_1_6_4, tags/Version_1_34_1 and branches/RC_1_34_0.
> > Is this intentional?
> It looks to me as if svn/boost/trunk mirrors the Boost distribution
> directory structure, as it should.
Maybe so, but then why aren't branches and tags organized in the same way?
It's not just that I find it more convenient to have an explicit directory
beneath "trunk", I also find the difference in approach misleading and
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk