From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-08 14:21:18
Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Maik Beckmann wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2007 16:23:58 schrieb David Abrahams:
>>> Bill just sent me this clarification privately: they can handle
>>> parallel *builds* (with some caveats I didn't really understand that
>>> made it sound somewhat unreliable)
>> AFAIK the caveat is that cmake doesn't build anythink itself, it just
>> generates a bunch of files for the target buildsystem.
>> Thus building parallel on unix flavors (including mac and msys on
>> no problem, but i.e. nmake on windows can't(AFAIK).
> Newer versions of Visual Studio can, however, parallelize the build.
> It actually gives a decent performance boost in the build, even on
> just a dual-core machine.
Am I the only one who questions the prudence of relying on N+1 make
systems, instead of 1?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk