Re: [boost] [time_series] Review

From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-09 00:09:24

On 8 Aug 2007, at 16:07, Steven Watanabe wrote:

>
> They are still needed for the result of adjacent_difference
> on piecewise constant floating point series.  What do you think
> of allowing runs to specify what kind of range they use, open,
> closed or half-open.
>
> struct half_open_range : mpl::int_<0> {};
> struct rhalf_open_range : mpl::int_<1> {}; // (]
> struct open_range : mpl::int_<2> {};
> struct closed_range : mpl::int_<3> {};
>
> I think that this would allow sparse floating point series
> to make sense without destroying consistency within the
> library.

Why do you need intervals for sparse series? Sparse series define  
values only at a finite number of points, and not in intervals? Do  
you mean piecewise constant series?