Re: [boost] BOOST_MSVC versus _MSC_VER

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-09 04:18:04

>-----Original Message-----
>From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven Watanabe
>Sent: 08 August 2007 22:49
>To: boost_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_MSVC versus _MSC_VER
>
>AMDG
>
>Paul A Bristow <pbristow <at> hetp.u-net.com> writes:
>
>> 2  failure to push'n'pop warning suppression?  I've spotted 
>several mistakes -
>and worry about others
>> confusing users, especially
>> C4244. How can we check for this automatically?
>> 
>
>We can scan each file for the pragmas
>and check whether every #pragma warning(suppress)
>is between a #pragma warning push and a pop
>
>I'll look into writing the script and possibly
>adding it to inspect.

Good - I'm sure this will catch some mistakes that could really confuse users.
>
>What pragmas do other compilers use for suppressing warnings?

I don't know - and hope others can advise, especially the ones cunningly pretending to be msvc ;-)

Paul

---
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
[phone] & SMS, Mobile [phone] & SMS
pbristow_at_[hidden]