From: Daniel Wallin (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-09 05:18:35
John Maddock wrote:
> Daniel Wallin wrote:
>> The standard practice with subversion is to `svn delete` old branches
>> once they have been merged. This keeps the branch directory nice and
>> clean (and frees up the branch name for future use). Does anyone have
>> any objections to deleting all old branches?
> I wish someone would actually :-)
> The branches directory is simply huge currently!
OK, I just removed all branches that hasn't been touched in 2 years:
We could probably remove more branches, but 2 years seemed like a safe
-- Daniel Wallin Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk