From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-10 09:03:56
Doug Gregor <dgregor <at> osl.iu.edu> writes:
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Nicola Musatti wrote:
> > Maybe so, but then why aren't branches and tags organized in the
> > same way?
> Because cvs2svn converted it with everything inside "trunk/boost",
> "branches/RC_1_34_0/boost", etc. and I only went in and fixed the
> trunk. Someone should go in and patch up the other branches, so we
> don't have the extra, nested "boost".
I'm beginning to understand why Daniel Wallin was so eager to remove old
Thanks for the explanation!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk