|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-10 11:53:17
on Fri Aug 10 2007, Nicola Musatti <Nicola.Musatti-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Daniel Wallin <daniel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
>
>> OK, I just removed all branches that hasn't been touched in 2 years:
>>
>> http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/38550
>>
>> We could probably remove more branches, but 2 years seemed like a safe
>> cutoff.
>
> I'm not convinced this is such a good idea. Some of the deleted branches don't
> seem to have much use nowadays, but some might; I'm thinking of the old RC and
> the SPIRIT_MINIBOOST ones.
>
> At the very least I would have waited a few months before proceding, or maybe
> just moved branches to old_branches.
You can get them back, you know. They're still there in the revision
history.
> The more I have to do with Subversion the more I think that making tags and
> branches plain directories was an extremely bad idea.
Relevance?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk