Re: [boost] [intrusive] Interface for hooking into client code improvable?

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-10 19:35:58

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> I agree. Having T as the first parameter would be ideal. Putting the 
> configuration pack at the end of the expected parameters (predicate 
> function + hash). Something like:
> 
> list<T, ...>
> set<T, Pred, options...>
> unordered_set<T, Hash, Pred, options...>

Well, this one would have the "consistency bonus". Still, I'd probably 
put everything OPTIONal into the options, because it's just more practical.

> Whatever option I choose, I'll need to think about how I'll pass diverse 
> hook information in the configuration and still support the stateful 
> non-intrusive hooks you pointed out in this thread. Who said Intrusive 
> was just in maintenance mode!

I'm glad to hear you found the discussion inspiring - it has been a 
pleasure.

Regards,
Tobias