From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-20 02:20:18
Thanks for pointing this out.
It looks to me that this would require linking with the thread library.
I was thinking more along the lines of something built with
the code in boost/detail/lightweigth_mutex
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> I think that very useful in this effort would be lightweight
>> threadsafe singleton.
> Recently found the same. Do you want a Singleton with thread-safe
> initialization? Or one with automatically thread-safe access to its
>> Someone please tell me its here but that I just haven't found it.
> The archive at
> contains both of the variants mentioned above.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk