Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-20 11:04:25


Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:02 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> What are the next steps ? If I understand correctly, the 1_34_0 branch
>> should now be copied to, say, 'stable', such that in regular intervals
>> things can be merged in from the trunk. Am I reading the suggested
>> procedure correctly ? (And then, at some point, 'stable' can be
>> branched
>> to '1_35', etc....)
>
> That is my understanding, although IIRC, the last discussion ended up
> with, "We can finalize the new procedure later, once we have moved to
> Subversion." Personally, I'd like to see us find a good way to turn
> "stable" into an actual release branch of "trunk", with the
> appropriate svmerge.py tags to make it easy to keep it up-to-date.
> The trunk/stable divergence is really bad for future development.

Has there been any progress on these questions ?

There is no 'stable' branch right now (no matter the spelling), so
people don't know what reference code to take if they want to set
up a development branch, or to merge 'new' (accepted, but not yet
released) libraries in.

Pleeaase ! (Any decision is better than no decision...)

(Also, somewhat unrelated, http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/roadmap
 indicates the 1.34.1 release as open and '3 months late', and there is
 no place discussing what to expect from 1.35 in terms of new features,
 additional libraries, etc.)

Thanks,
                Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk