Re: [boost] Constrained Value library

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-21 11:50:42

>-----Original Message-----
>From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert Kawulak
>Sent: 21 August 2007 16:11
>To: boost_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [boost] Constrained Value library
>
>> 3  Some inline comments on the example could explain why some 
>> definitions are so verbose - for those who have yet to RTFM ;-)
>
>Which particular definitions you mean?

Some definitions are one-liners and pretty obvious.

It's less obvious (until you read the manual!) why other definitions takes 6 lines ;-)

Paul