From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-21 20:32:29
On 8/21/07, Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Zach Laine wrote:
> > Are there any plan to add transfer_lock, and any other such generic
> > algoirthms you have lying around, to the proposal as well?
> Thanks for the great comments Zach.
You're quite welcome. :)
> I put transfer_lock into <shared_mutex> which is TR2-targeted. The
> std::lock and std::try_lock algorithms are in <mutex>, actually in the
> implementation <mutex_base> header, and targeted towards C++0X. Some
> of the other examples are just meant to be example client code (like
> mutex_debug). If you have a burning desire to get one of them into C+
> +0X or TR2, please let me know.
No, I just wanted to see transfer_lock preserved somewhere more
permanent than in an example.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk