|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Zach Laine: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Previous message: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- In reply to: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Next in thread: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Reply: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Today I don't use list::size() in portable code. Why? Because we
>> gave the vendor too much freedom.
>
> How do you compute the size of a std::list in portable code then? :)
I try not to. If I find I must, I write my own replacement list. It
is one of the simpler containers to write.
-Howard
- Next message: Zach Laine: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Previous message: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- In reply to: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Next in thread: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
- Reply: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [thread] RFC standard proposed mutex, read-write mutex, condition"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk