From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 04:25:22
Andrey Semashev <andysem <at> mail.ru> writes:
> This would be a very nice addition for the typeof-based macros. But, I
> still would like to have an alternative syntax not involving
> Boost.Typeof, as it's quoted below.
If other people vote for it, I'll add it.
> I think, a short table with test results on most common compilers
> (say, GCC and VC 7.1) would be a good performance indication to users.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk