Re: [boost] ScopeExit review

From: Yanchenko Maxim (maximyanchenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 12:37:37

I agree with Steven,

This syntax looks same as the new Boost.Parameter syntax, and this is good for the Boost as a whole.

Thanks,
Maxim

23.08.07, 20:03, Steven Watanabe:

> I prefer BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT((cref c)(ref r)(val v))
> for two reasons.
> 1) It makes it clear that they are /not/ function
>    calls
> 2) It's slightly easier to implement because you
>    can use BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH.
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe