From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 13:44:23
Beman Dawes wrote:
> That would work, and avoid having two directories named trunk. OTOH it
> now has two directories named 1_35_0.
> Is there any point having two copies of the final for a release?
> Wouldn't it be potentially less confusing for the release manager to
> move 1_35_0 from svn/boost/branches/release to svn/boost/release at
> time of release? And since there would only be one release
> work-in-progress directory at a time under branches/release, the
> release level could be eliminated.
> So after 1.35.0 ships, the tree would look like:
Yep, we don't need copies of release-candidates lying around: once these
become official releases, they can be moved to the /release/ directory.
Merrily painting that bike shed yours, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk