|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 13:50:16
on Thu Aug 23 2007, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-pdimov.com> wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> svn/boost/
>>
>> trunk/
>>
>> tags/
>> ...
>> release/
>> 1_34_1
>> 1_35_0
>> ...
>> branches/
>> release/
>> 1_35_0
>> ...
>> libraries/
>> python/
>> serialization/
>>
>> ?
>
> What's wrong with using a "non-sanctioned" structure? Must we insist on
> trunk/tags/branches?
No, but doing something reminiscent of the usual structure will be
easier to grasp for most people. It's not a big deal, but Beman's
original proposal used essentially the same rationale to justify some
of its choices.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk