From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-24 14:47:29
Robert Ramey wrote:
> If anyone can't wait for a Boost threadsafe
> singleton, they can substitute my trivial one
> for one of their own choosing.
Thats a step in the right direction!
> That is, I'm offloading this issue to anyone else
How about a different way to think about the problem?
As I recall, the problem with the thread-safety of the serialization
library relates to setting up the type info maps. If you could somehow
create a way that one could invoke the setup of this map perhaps by a
function call, that would solve the problem, yes?
Thanks for looking at the problem in any case.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk