Re: [boost] Boost threadsafe singleton? - Inclusion in Boost

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-24 14:47:29

Robert Ramey wrote:
> If anyone can't wait for a Boost threadsafe
> singleton, they can substitute my trivial one
> for one of their own choosing.
>   
Thats a step in the right direction!

> That is, I'm offloading this issue to anyone else
>   
How about a different way to think about the problem?

As I recall, the problem with the thread-safety of the serialization 
library relates to setting up the type info maps. If you could somehow 
create a way that one could invoke the setup of this map perhaps by a 
function call, that would solve the problem, yes?

Thanks for looking at the problem in any case.

Sohail