From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-27 13:38:09
Monday, August 27, 2007, 8:33:11 PM, you wrote:
> Hasn't Anthony Williams already implemented a header-only call_once? I'm not
> sure I see a reason to reinvent that particular wheel. Once boost::mutex is
> made header-only, there'd be no need for lightweight_mutex either and I'll
> be able to retire it as well.
I see only Win32 implementation in the thread_rewrite branch. Besides,
it looks like he uses quite a heavy solution using a mutex.
Once the new lighter version of Boost.Thread is released I'd happily
switch to it too.
-- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk