From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-28 04:17:45
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Hasn't Anthony Williams already implemented a header-only call_once? I'm not
> sure I see a reason to reinvent that particular wheel. Once boost::mutex is
> made header-only, there'd be no need for lightweight_mutex either and I'll
> be able to retire it as well.
I have implemented a header-only call_once for Windows --- on the
thread_rewrite branch in SVN. I plan to get to pthreads sometime in the near
The win32 implementation of mutex is also header-only, and I plan to add a
header-only pthreads implementation too.
-- Anthony Williams Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk