Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-31 09:16:05

Gennadiy Rozental skrev:
> "Frank Birbacher" <bloodymir.crap_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:fb7kpn$or8$
>> Hi!
>> Gennadiy Rozental schrieb:
>>> What's wrong with solutions I proposed?
>>> You can always do this in your code:
>>> #define CHECK_NOT_EQ( a, b ) BOOST_CHECK_PREDICATE( _1 != _2, (a)(b))
>> Yes, you can always do this. But libraries are to make things convenient.
>> For my part I don't see any point in the new macro. I propse the use of
>> BOOST_CHECK( a != b );
>> The standard "assert" doesn't provide more either. And there would be an
>> exponential number of combinations of warning level, optional message,
>> and various kinds of operators. Unless these can be automatically
>> generated I would resort to simple things as the above.
> Actually my solution is preferable, since you will be able to see matched
> values

And that is exactly why the library should provide those shortcuts by


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at