From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-31 10:25:11
on Thu Aug 30 2007, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
>> Since my SoC package constitutes a significant addition to the
>> Boost.Graph library, Jeremy and I felt that it would benefit from the
>> formal review process - especially the newer code that is concerned
>> with the library interface. However, we're unsure if the review needs
>> the same formality as a completely new library since this is, as
>> mentioned, a (albeit rather large) change to an existing library.
> I agree with Beman... I don't think we need a full formal review, but
> something like it would be useful.
In particular, I don't think votes for or against acceptance would be
Doug, there is a Trac peer review plugin you might want to think about
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk