Re: [boost] [serialization][trunk]please bring us archive helpersback

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-08 17:41:22

"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" wrote:

> So, if I'm getting you right now, what you propose is to
> have a naked_text_archive without helper support nor
> special shared_ptr support and text_archive with both helper
> and shared_ptr stuff?

naked archive wouldn't have support for helpers of any kind.
This is as it is now. particular archives - text, binary, and xml
would include helper support implemented as a mix-in which
would re-implement the runtime helper support like 1.33

>Is the goal of this move to have
>the helper API back in place without making it part
> of the Archive concept?

Yes ,that would be the object of this excercise.

Note that I did things the way I did as I though the issues
related to serialization of shared_ptr were very unique. I
would be curious to know if anyone else had problems
with this.

Robert Ramey

> Joaquín M López Muñoz
> Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost