Re: [boost] Suggest: detail functions for full built-in arithmetic

From: Robert Kawulak (kawulak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-11 12:08:53

> From: Phil Endecott
> Michael Marcin wrote:
> > Phil Endecott wrote:
> > RVCT 2.2 with --arm and -O2
> It looks like your compiler is not inlining full_add inside 
> no_overflow, and is doing a lot of spurious argument save/restore.  

This is what I've recently learnt from Mathias:

> From: Mathias Gaunard
> Robert Kawulak wrote:
> > I compiled it with gcc 4.01, optimisations turned on. I had 
> > to add explicit 'inline' to several functions
> Aggressive inlining should be enabled with -O3.

Having glanced at the manual I suppose this should also work with RVCT. ;-)

Best regards,
Robert