Boost logo

Boost :

From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-30 02:15:11


* What is your evaluation of the design?
* What is your evaluation of the implementation?

Adequate

* What is your evaluation of the documentation?

Needs a better motivating discussion as to how this library improves
upon std::exception. Maybe a "best-practices" section
could illustrate a few common scenerios.

* What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness
of the library?

High

* Did you try to use the library? With what compiler?
Did you have any problems?

Compiled fine on my gcc 4.1x compiler.

* How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?

2 hours. It took me hardly any time getting up to speed on this
library and it works as advertised.

* Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?

I'm a long time user of "std::exception".

*should this library be approved as a boost library?

Count me as a "yes" vote. Thanks to the author.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk