|
Boost : |
From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-30 02:15:11
* What is your evaluation of the design?
* What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Adequate
* What is your evaluation of the documentation?
Needs a better motivating discussion as to how this library improves
upon std::exception. Maybe a "best-practices" section
could illustrate a few common scenerios.
* What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness
of the library?
High
* Did you try to use the library? With what compiler?
Did you have any problems?
Compiled fine on my gcc 4.1x compiler.
* How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
2 hours. It took me hardly any time getting up to speed on this
library and it works as advertised.
* Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
I'm a long time user of "std::exception".
*should this library be approved as a boost library?
Count me as a "yes" vote. Thanks to the author.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk