From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-03 12:01:55
For that matter, why is boost::exception() necessary.
Lets support the following syntax as well.
std::cerr << e;
Also, I say we keep the name boost::exception, at
least until an equally clear library name is discovered.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk