From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-08 09:28:13
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> FWIW, Intel V10 on Windows seems not to implement _ReadWriteBarrier
> neither (at least we get linker errors there as well).
Does its manual say something about reorderings across a volatile read or
write? I think that giving volatile loads acquire semantics (and volatile
stores release semantics) is an Intel invention later adopted by MSVC8, so
it might already implement what we need.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk