|
Boost : |
From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-11 08:19:34
First there was a typo:
it should read
operator T() const
not
operator T&() const
Zara wrote:
> I may not work for PODs. It depends on the data alignment of the
> compiler, and the data alignment capabilities of the processor.
>
> You are invoking the dreaded devils of Undefined Behaviour!
Of course I want to avoid this, but could you please be more specific?
Is it the
static_cast<T>(*data)
that will cause troubles?
If so why?
Would it be better to use something like
operator T() const
{
T t = 0;
for (unsigned n=0; n<sizeof(T); ++n)
{
t |= ((T)data[n])<<(8*n);
}
return t;
}
Roland aka speedsnail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk